In addition the D-lighting (fine) is NX does a better job than what I can figure out in Lightroom, so this is an area of technology that Adobe should work on (or I need to figure out how to do it better using Lightroom). It would be nice to know if I am just hallucinating, or if the developers really have worked on this -)įor the profiles to match I have to turn off Active D-lighting, a feature which reduces dynamic range in a very fine manner with the D700. Also, the sharpening seems to be improved by being able to apply much more sharpening without objectionable artifacts creeping in as soon. Seems like the new lightroom engine has improved on this. Nikon D700 always had a tendency to render this type of scenes mushy compared to Canon 5D (just look at Ken Rockwells examples), and I have also experienced the same. V2 seems to have gotten so close now, that for it is in the range of very acceptable.Īlso, the de-mosaic of D700 raw fines with fine density leaves, foliage seems to be improved compared to NX. In addition, NX skin tones were warmer, and contrast not as agressive as V1. 1 gave much too flat colors, especially a brightly sunlit yellow house facade was washed out, but now is very close to NX. Now I have consistency of images in my workflow from camera to lightroom without having to go via NX. This now give a much better match to the native camera picture controls as rendered with Capture NX. The online Adobe user-to-user forums here: The profiles are currently in beta status. Note that the above path on Windows Vista and Windows 7 may be hidden
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |